Press Release For Immediate Release 5/09/2016

The Atlantic Sunrise Project (Williams/Transco) is proposed to bisect Lancaster County, and parts of 9 other counties in the Commonwealth, to carry hydraulically fracked natural gas from the Marcellus Shale region to the eastern seaboard, most of it for export. 

The Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) recently issued the necessary 401 Water Quality Certificate for this project to move forward, posted on the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) site April 12. Lancaster Against Pipelines (LAP) is challenging this certificate in two ways. 

First, LAP requested a petition of Review of an Agency Order on Thursday, May 4, with the Federal Third Circuit Court of Appeals. Second, LAP also filed a notice of appeal with the Pennsylvania Environmental Hearing Board the same day. 

LAP claims that the certificate violates the Clean Water Act. 

Article 1, Section 27 of the Pennsylvania State Constitution states that: 

"The people have a right to clean air, pure water, and to the preservation of the natural, scenic, historic, and esthetic values of the environment. Pennsylvania's public natural resources are the common property of all of the people, including generations yet to come. As trustee of these resources, the Commonwealth shall conserve and maintain them for the benefit of all the people." 

LAP is a 501c3 federal non-profit organization representing hundreds of residents who are directly affected by this destructive proposal. The members of LAP are committed to keeping the Atlantic Sunrise pipeline out of Lancaster County as it represents a massive violation of our communities, natural environment, and rights under the PA Constitution.

 


Major US Presidential Candidate Denounces Atlantic Sunrise Pipeline

Bernie_Millersville.jpgAs you probably know, Lancaster Against Pipelines (LAP) includes Republicans, Democrats, Independents and Greens; and we do not endorse any particular candidates or parties. 

That said, we are overwhelmed and truly grateful when a presidential candidate chooses to stand with us in our fight to keep the Atlantic Sunrise Project out of our community.  Malinda Clatterbuck of LAP gave an inspiring speech to the crowd of over 3,000 at a Millersville University presidential rally last night.  Then US Senator and Presidential Candidate Bernie Sanders had this to say:  “While I am here in Pennsylvania, let me just mention to you that I am proud to join a grassroots coalition of local residents, business owners, farmers, and religious leaders in strong opposition to the Atlantic Sunrise Pipeline.”

LAP challenges all candidates and voters to reject the idea that fracking and pipelines are some kind of bridge to a more sustainable future at a time when climate change is at our door and fossil fuel extraction is a threat to our communities, our environment and precious water resources.  

Thank you Senator Sanders for standing with the thousands of PA residents who are committed to keeping the Atlantic Sunrise Project out of our state!

Click here to view YouTube video of Millersville University Rally including Malinda Clatterbuck's speech and introduction.

Click here to read Lancaster Newspaper's online article regarding Senator Sanders' statement against the ASP.


The Atlantic Sunrise Project: Evidence of Opposition

A review of public documents

Review and Analysis by Marita Hines, Lancaster Against Pipelines (LAP)

January 25, 2016

 

Introduction: 

williams2.jpg
Williams Partners is proposing to build a large high-pressure pipeline, the Atlantic Sunrise project, the full length of Lancaster County, passing through farmlands, woodlands, and residential lots, a county that is historically and ecologically sensitive.  Based on Williams' documents, the purpose of this project is to take the abundant gas from the Marcellus Shale region of Pennsylvania and transport it to LNG export facilities, both at Cove Point, Maryland, and along the gulf coast.  

Although FERC "collects" public comment and does facilitate some landowner issues in order to get through the approval process, the comments appear to be used for little else.  No real measure of opposition is determined or considered for approval of the project which carries with it the power of eminent domain.  These are the observations of our group.  This analysis was submitted to FERC, challenging them to provide any evidence that other projects have been disapproved due to opposition or that this data is analyzed by FERC in any way.  Lancaster Against Pipelines (LAP) felt that the comments and other public information was worthy of analysis and set out to do just that.

Analysis of Letters to FERC:

All letters to FERC posted under project PF 14-8-000 (submitted under the FERC prefiling process) and CP 15-138-000 (submitted under the formal filing process) have been reviewed and categorized through January 17, 2016. 

Information was extracted from each comment.  some of the results are summarized in the tables below.  

Level of Pipeline Support

FERC comments were reviewed in order to determine if submissions were in favor of the pipeline.  The level of support for this project here in Lancaster County according to FERC comments is a paltry 1.6%, and 3.1% for all combined areas. 

 Opposition.jpg

Note that only 2,396 of the comments provided ZIP Code/location information (41% of total comments) and 61% of those were from Lancaster County.  In other words, Lancaster residents were most vocal and least supportive of the project. 

Level of Pipeline Support in Impacted Area 

The analysis assumes the "impacted" area to be the counties in which the Atlantic Sunrise pipeline is proposed to be constructed.  It finds that of the pro-pipeline comments where a ZIP Code/location was provided, only 43.3% were from the "impacted" area compared to 94.9% for opposition comments.  This supports LAP's belief that pro-pipeline comments are largely from those employed by the gas industry or who have received grant monies. 

 impacted.jpg

FERC Comment Concerns

Top landowner concerns for the project overall and here in Lancaster County are related to the destruction and diminished use of their properties. 

One of the reasons that LAP does not feel that this project should carry the power of eminent domain is that the natural gas is of no benefit to our local community or the state and, in fact, the project is counter to landowner's own use for their land, both business and personal.   FERC should be required to clarify why it feels one private business' profits are more important than all others' needs for this land, including business needs.

LOComments.jpg

Overall, commenters expressed concerns about natural resources, conservation land and safety. 

OverallComments.jpg

  

Analysis of Opposition by Measuring Landowner Cooperation

The amount of opposition to this project here in Lancaster County is reflected in the comments.  We also believe that the level of cooperation in the form of easement agreements and the "blockades" of landowners against this project is just as revealing.

Impact Measured by Landowner Agreements

More than 15 months ago, Williams Partners began making offers to landowners along the proposed Atlantic Sunrise pipeline prior to their formal filing with FERC.  A former FERC attorney, Carolyn Elefant, stated to a Lancaster Newspaper reporter for an article dated September 23, 2014, that what Williams was doing was standard business practice.  "And is done for a reason", Elefant said.  "Early property acquisition basically locks in the company's preferred route," she said, "and forecloses meaningful consideration of alternatives as required by National Environmental Policy Act."  Elefant also stated in this article that "One of the criteria that FERC evaluates in determining whether to approve a project is impact to landowners.  If landowners voluntarily agree to a negotiated easement, FERC will find that they are not adversely impacted".  

It appears to our group that the numerous "alternatives" being proposed by Williams are really just a farce to make it look as if they are considerate of landowner concerns.  We wish to be clear that our group does not believe it is in the best interest of our county or even our country to allow this pipeline through any route in order to export the natural gas for private profit.  In fact, expert energy analyst Dennis Witmer recently presented to our group that the entire project is not economically feasible and would ultimately result in higher rates for ratepayers here in the US. 

That said, we believe that the number of easements in place at this point after an aggressive 15-month campaign by Williams is telling.  Our analysis required review of landowner easements for the Atlantic Sunrise Project.  The easement agreements are publicly available via the Lancaster County website and include an agreed-to route across the landowners' properties.  By mapping the individual plots with and without easements, we were able to determine that at the most 66.9% of landowners in Lancaster County are under agreement for the Atlantic Sunrise pipeline.  The non-easement properties were determined by analyzing the "gaps" in the route under agreement and using the least number of properties possible to close the gap. 

 Easements.jpg

In some areas of Lancaster County, the opposition by Landowners is very strong.  Notice that through the town of Conestoga, only 27.8% of landowners have signed easements.  As landowner cooperation is one of the criteria FERC uses for approval of the pipeline, this alone should cause them to reject the project outright.  

Conclusions

This study was conducted to analyze the public records that have been generated during the permitting process for the Williams Pipeline Atlantic Sunrise project.   While numerous paid advertisements purchased by the Gas Industry claim that this project has strong support, the public records reviewed in this study indicate very strong opposition.  

In addition to the strong community opposition, LAP believes that Lancaster County is steep in historical significance that will be impacted by this pipeline.  A recent newspaper article published by Lancaster Newspapers reported that 11 new archaeological sites have been registered with the Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission over the past year.  All of these new sites, along with a 12th site registered in 1972, are along the proposed route of the pipeline. 

These are just some of the many reasons LAP and its members have asked FERC to disapprove this project. 

How Can You Get Involved in this Movement?

Consider making a donation to this worthy cause, or volunteer your talents and services.

 

Author:  Marita Hines

Marita Hines recently retired from her Financial Analyst position with US Postal Service Headquarters in Washington, DC, is a resident of Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, and active member of Lancaster Against Pipelines (LAP).

About LAP:

Lancaster Against Pipelines (LAP) is a 501(c)3 federally recognized non-profit organization.  It is a grassroots coalition of local residents, business owners, church communities, and non-profits committed to protecting our county against the proposed Atlantic Sunrise gas pipeline.  The permanent right of way for this unwanted line through Lancaster County targets more than 50 preserved farms, plows through more than 50 scenic waterways, permanently fragments our woods, severely limits how landowners may use their own land, lowers property values, and poses a perpetual threat of toxic leaks and explosions to county residents.  We believe our community has an inherent right to say "NO" to large-scale industrial projects that exploit our land, endanger our families, and radically threaten our way of life.  We believe that the federal government should not grant the power of eminent domain to a project designed largely to carry US energy overseas.  It is our mission to challenge and overturn this broken system.

 


LAP Has Strong Showing at Farm Show

farmingnotfracking.jpgLancaster Against Pipelines (LAP) came out in force to show support for "Farmers, Not Fracking," a rally coordinated by the group Pennsylvanians Against Fracking.  LAP was there to support our farmers who are being asked to sacrifice their business priorities for that of the private profits of Williams Partners.  Williams Partners has applied to FERC to install a large 42" high pressure greenfield pipeline through rich farmland, and land of historical and archaeological significance.  The purpose of the pipeline is largely for export of Marcellus fracked gas to international markets and of little benefit to people in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, or even the nation. 

Farmers in Lancaster County confirm what experts say -- a natural gas pipeline impacts crop production for many years to come.  Farmers and other land owners should not be asked to sacrifice their livelihoods.  


Days of Revolt: The Revolution Will be Local

Pulitzer Prize winning author Chris Hedges interviews CELDF’s Thomas Linzey and our very own Mark Clatterbuck of Lancaster Against Pipelines about the growing local resistance and organizing against the fracking industry.   


Conestoga Area Historical Society Rejects Williams' Grant Money

ConestogaHistorical.jpgMembers from groups opposing the Atlantic Sunrise Pipeline came out in force when they heard the Conestoga Area Historical Society (CAHS) would be discussing a $10,000 grant from Williams Partners.  Following the regular monthly board meeting this past Thursday, community members expressed their anger and betrayal.  Ken Hoak read a scathing account of all the events leading up to the decision to accept money from Williams.

It was clear that some CAHS board members did not wish to take money from a company whose project would destroy important historical sites. but they made their case that the funds were sorely needed.  What followed was an outpouring of promises from the community in exchange for a rejection of the grant money.  In turn, folks from the audience offered their assistance--to build shelving, perform gardening and general repairs, make website updates, help with their facebook page and provide assistance with a mailing.  

Each year the society raffles off an 18th century Flintlock. This year's rifle is a 50 calibur PA Isaac Haines style rifle. It is made by journeyman gunmaker Dan Behmer from Conestoga. Dan won two awards at the 3rd annual Dixon's gunman ing fair. The rifle is inscribed CAHS 25th Anniversary #1.  It comes with the following accessories: presentation quality curly maple stock and woodside patch box; neck knife with beaded sheath; scrimshaw ed powder horn by Bob Lerh in 18th century style; 18th century leather possible bag. First prize is the rifle and accouterments OR $2000. Second and third prizes are $100 each. You do not need to be present to win. Tickets are $20. The drawing will be held on December 12th at 9 PM during the candlelight tour. Only 500 tickets are being sold.

Museums of this size depend heavily on the support of the public.   Raffle tickets can be purchased at the museum, 51 Kendig Road, Conestoga, Saturdays or Sundays, 1-4 PM.

 

 

 


Mark Clatterbuck Found "Not Guilty"

Meehan_Clatterbuck.jpgThe Quarryville magistrate determined that Mark Clatterbuck is "not guilty" of disorderly conduct and that the state failed to make their case.  This comes as no surprise to the crowd of family and friends who came out to support Mark.  Attorney Sam Mecum successfully presented the defense's case.  

Clatterbuck and other concerned citizens visited Williams Partners job site in Rock Springs on September 26th. As a result of their efforts, Williams workers were cited for 10 erosion and sedimentation control violations by a state-designated inspector.  In Lancaster County, the Lancaster County Conservation District is the agency designated by the state Department of Environmental Protection to investigate complaints and inspect earth disturbance activities for violations of the Pennsylvania Clean Streams Law.

After returning to the scene, Mark noticed all of the license plates on the job site were out of town and decided to videotape them.   The next day he received a call from the State Police letting him know of the charges against him.

Mark's full statement regarding the events can be found here.


Veteran Energy Analyst Speaks Out Against Economic Feasibility of the Atlantic Sunrise Pipeline

crowd2.jpgOn back-to-back nights at Millersville University and Franklin & Marshall College (Nov. 4-5),  Lancaster County residents heard a presentation delivered by Dr. Dennis Witmer, a Millersville University alum and veteran energy analyst. Although Dr. Witmer supports natural gas use in the United States under certain conditions, he delivered a scathing critique of Williams’s proposed Atlantic Sunrise Project, meticulously detailing why the project should be rejected by FERC and aggressively opposed by Lancaster County residents.
#1: The Atlantic Sunrise Project (ASP) is economically doomed.
Public data confirms that the ASP is primarily intended to ship natural gas supplies from Pennsylvania’s Marcellus Shale to overseas markets, primarily in Asia. While the 2013 price of natural gas in these markets appeared to promise profits to a small number of investors at the time, plunging gas prices over the past two years will likely yield massive losses for companies now rushing to move US gas overseas. Witmer issued a dire warning to ASP investors, advising them to pull out now while they can.
 
#2: The Atlantic Sunrise Project represents a massive redistribution of wealth from the middle class to a small number of wealthy investors.
Since the Atlantic Sunrise plans to ship US energy to oversea markets, those being forced to carry the costs and risks of the project (via fracking, transmission line construction, permanent right-of-ways, etc.) realize no lasting benefit from this costly, and sometimes dangerous, industrialization. In short, everyday Americans are shouldering enormous costs so residents of Japan and India can enjoy access to cheaper gas. Witmer describes the ASP “a huge transfer of wealth from the US consumer to the wealthy few.”
 
#3: The Atlantic Sunrise Project means higher gas prices for US consumers.
By shipping US gas overseas for higher profits, instead of keeping it in place for US customers down the road, Williams is keeping gas prices higher in the US despite a glut of domestic natural gas. But, according to Witmer, the greed of the gas industry doesn’t end there! Because later on, when US gas supplies are running low, the industry will sell that gas back to us for inflated prices once again! The gas companies profit in both cases; US consumers lose in both cases. Refer back to Point #2.
 
#4: The Atlantic Sunrise Project does not meet the criteria for Eminent Domain.
Given the explicit intentions of the ASP to transfer US natural gas to foreign markets, Witmer openly challenges those who say this project serves “a public good” for Americans. He sees large-scale litigation on the horizon if Williams persists in its plans to run this pipeline through the communities of unwilling landowners here in Lancaster and other affected counties.
 

Lancaster's Proposed Natural Gas Pipeline in the Global Marketplace

“It appears that the only beneficiaries of LNG exports are the owners of the natural gas resources and infrastructure, and that any claim that this project provides public benefit is false.” 

Read more

Fabricated Charges Used to Silence Pipeline Critics

"The charge filed against me would be laughable if it weren’t for the terrifying reality it exposes: namely, that Williams can pick up the phone and have any one of us hauled into court for daring to oppose the exploitation of our land."

Read more